{"id":809,"date":"2023-07-11T09:18:22","date_gmt":"2023-07-11T05:18:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/?p=809"},"modified":"2023-07-11T09:18:22","modified_gmt":"2023-07-11T05:18:22","slug":"a-rom-com-called-meritocracy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/2023\/07\/11\/a-rom-com-called-meritocracy\/","title":{"rendered":"A ROM COM Called &#8221; Meritocracy &#8220;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Merit might seem like a <strong>ROM COM<\/strong>, but there is <em>merit<\/em> in talking about it I guess.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>Meritocracy is our social ideal, particularly among good liberals. Equality of opportunity, but not of outcome<\/em><\/span><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>To this day, the origin of the term <strong>meritocracy<\/strong> is widely attributed to the <strong>British sociologist<\/strong> <strong>Michael Young<\/strong>, who used it pejoratively in his book &#8220;<strong>The Rise of the Meritocracy<\/strong> &#8220;. For Young, <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>merit is defined as intelligence plus effort.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The triumph of <strong>meritocracy<\/strong> <strong>as a social ideal<\/strong> was a turning point in human history. Before the <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Enlightenment<\/strong><\/span>, most societies were elaborately stratified- be it <strong>England<\/strong>&#8216;s hierarchy of <em>king, duke, earl, viscount<\/em>, and <em>baron<\/em>, or <strong>China<\/strong>&#8216;s imperial order of <em>Emperor, heshuo qinwang, duoluo junwang, duoluo beile, and gushan beizi<\/em>. In these regimes, the vast majority of people- <em>peasants, servants, slaves<\/em> &#8211; had little hope of bettering their station.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Many philosophers like <strong>John Locke, Charles Montesquieu<\/strong> and <strong>Jean Jacques Rousseau<\/strong> in fact questioned the idea of an unelected elite. On the eve of the <strong>American Revolution<\/strong>, <strong>Thomas Paine<\/strong> boldly proclaimed that &#8221; <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived<\/em><\/span>&#8220;. In Paine&#8217;s view, power was the gift of the people rather than the divine right of the monarch.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Meritocracy<\/strong> raises the returns on talent by ensuring that individuals are free to contribute and succeed, whatever their social rank or personal connections. That said, its troubling that <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>bureaucracy<\/em><\/span> &#8211; <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>the world&#8217;s most ubiquitous social structure<\/em><\/span>&#8211; systematically undermines the cause of <strong>meritocracy<\/strong>. A recent survey in the <em>Harvard Business Review<\/em> had 76% of big company respondents saying that political behaviors highly influence who gets ahead in the organisation. \u00a0Though in theory <em>bureaucracy<\/em> is a ranking of merit where those with exceptional abilities get promoted over those are less accomplished. But, in practice, organisations rarely come even remotely close to achieving this idea.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It is said that it is more honorable to be raised to a throne than to be born to one. Fortune bestows the one,\u00a0<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>merit<\/em><\/span><\/strong>\u00a0obtains the other.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"quote_text\">\n<p><span class=\"quote_sign\">\u201c<\/span>That is the great danger of <strong>meritocracy<\/strong>: the people who reach the top of the system are precisely the people who have most completely identified with the system and its demands, creating a vicious circle preventing any actual change. It is no accident that conservatives tend to employ the rhetoric of social mobility so readily, as <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>social climbers generally do not ask questions about the ladder<\/em><\/span>.<span class=\"quote_sign\">\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div class=\"quote_author\">\u2014\u00a0<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Adam Kotsko<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>As I conclude, may I direct you to read this article in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brandknewmag.com\/\"><strong>BrandKnew<\/strong><\/a> where <strong>Bridgewater Investments Founder Ray Dalio<\/strong> talks about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brandknewmag.com\/bridgewater-investments-founder-ray-dalio-invest-in-idea-meritocracy\/\"><strong>Investing in Idea Meritocracy<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>ENDS<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Merit might seem like a ROM COM, but there is merit in talking about it I guess. &nbsp; Meritocracy is our social ideal, particularly among good liberals. Equality of opportunity, but not of outcome. &nbsp; To this day, the origin of the term meritocracy is widely attributed to the British sociologist Michael Young, who used &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/2023\/07\/11\/a-rom-com-called-meritocracy\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;A ROM COM Called &#8221; Meritocracy &#8220;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1675,49,1692,1682,1684,12,1670,1672,1334,1669,1668,1674,1687,478,1693,47,1685,1683,1671,1666,1676,1678,1686,494,1688,1691,1689,1690,1680,1681,1677,1679,1667,1673],"class_list":["post-809","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-american-revolution","tag-brandknew","tag-bridgewater-investments","tag-bureaucracy","tag-charles-montesquieu","tag-china","tag-duke","tag-earl","tag-effort","tag-emperor","tag-england","tag-enlightenment","tag-fortune","tag-harvard-business-review","tag-idea-meritocracy","tag-intelligence","tag-jean-jacques-rousseau","tag-john-locke","tag-king","tag-merit","tag-meritocracy","tag-michael-young","tag-monarch","tag-organisation","tag-peasants","tag-ray-dalio","tag-servants","tag-slaves","tag-social-ideal","tag-social-structure","tag-sociologist","tag-the-rise-of-the-meritocracy","tag-thomas-paine","tag-viscount"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/809","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=809"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/809\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":810,"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/809\/revisions\/810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sureshdinakaran.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}